Patient-Reported Outcomes After Vestibular Implantation for Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.

Importance: Standard-of-care treatment proves inadequate for many patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH). Vestibular implantation is an emerging alternative. Objective: To examine patient-reported outcomes from prosthetic vestibular stimulation. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Multichannel Vestibular Implant (MVI) Early Feasibility Study is an ongoing prospective, nonrandomized, single-group, single-center cohort study conducted at Johns Hopkins Hospital that has been active since 2016 in which participants serve as their own controls. The study includes adults with severe or profound adult-onset BVH for at least 1 year and inadequate compensation despite standard-of-care treatment. As of March 2023, 12 candidates completed the eligibility screening process. Intervention: The MVI system electrically stimulates semicircular canal branches of the vestibular nerve to convey head rotation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported outcome instruments assessing dizziness (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [DHI]) and vestibular-related disability (Vestibular Disorders-Activities of Daily Living [VADL]). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessed using the Short Form-36 Utility (SF36U) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), from which quality-adjusted life-years were computed. Results: Ten individuals (5 female [50%]; mean [SD] age, 58.5 [5.0] years; range, 51-66 years) underwent unilateral implantation. A control group of 10 trial applicants (5 female [50%]; mean [SD] age, 55.1 [8.5] years; range, 42-73 years) completed 6-month follow-up surveys after the initial application. After 0.5 years of continuous MVI use, a pooled mean (95% CI) of within-participant changes showed improvements in dizziness (DHI, -36; 95% CI, -55 to -18), vestibular disability (VADL, -1.7; 95% CI, -2.6 to -0.7), and HRQOL by SF36U (0.12; 95% CI, 0.07-0.17) but not HUI3 (0.02; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.27). Improvements exceeded minimally important differences in the direction of benefit (exceeding 18, 0.65, and 0.03, respectively, for DHI, VADL, and SF36U). The control group reported no mean change in dizziness (DHI, -4; 95% CI, -10 to 2), vestibular disability (VADL, 0.1; 95% CI, -0.9 to 1.1) or HRQOL per SF36U (0; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.05) but an increase in HRQOL per HUI3 (0.10; 95% CI, 0.04-0.16). Lifetime HRQOL gain for MVI users was estimated to be 1.7 quality-adjusted life-years (95% CI, 0.6-2.8) using SF36U and 1.4 (95% CI, -1.2 to 4.0) using HUI3. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that vestibular implant recipients report vestibular symptom improvements not reported by a control group. These patient-reported benefits support the use of vestibular implantation as a treatment for bilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design and Speech Understanding.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implant electrode arrays are categorized based on their design as lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LW versus PM designs on postoperative speech perception across multiple manufacturers and over long follow-up durations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 478 adult cochlear implant recipients, implanted between the years 1992 and 2017. INTERVENTIONSS: PM versus LW cochlear implants. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Postoperative Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Word (CNC-w) and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores between 6 months and 5 years. RESULTS: Across 478 patients, approximately one-third received LW (n = 176, 36.8%), whereas 302 patients received a PM array (63.2%). The PM group had higher CNC-w scores from 6 months to 2 years (52 [interquartile range, 38-68] versus 48 [31-62], p = 0.036) and from 2 to 5 years (58 [43-72] versus 48 [33-66], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of patient-averaged scores indicated that the PM group had greater improvement from preoperative scores at all time points after the initial 6 months for both CNC-w ( ß = 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.6-8.3], p = 0.023) and HINT testing ( ß = 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.7], p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that PM electrode arrays are associated with small increases in postoperative speech perception scores, relative to LW arrays, when assessed across manufacturers, over long time durations, and using multiple outcome instruments. These findings may help guide surgeon selection and patient counseling of cochlear implant arrays.

Cochlear implantation in unilateral hearing loss: impact of short- to medium-term auditory deprivation.

Introduction: Single sided deafness (SSD) results in profound cortical reorganization that presents clinically with a significant impact on sound localization and speech comprehension. Cochlear implantation (CI) has been approved for two manufacturers' devices in the United States to restore bilateral function in SSD patients with up to 10 years of auditory deprivation. However, there is great variability in auditory performance and it remains unclear how auditory deprivation affects CI benefits within this 10-year window. This prospective study explores how measured auditory performance relates to real-world experience and device use in a cohort of SSD-CI subjects who have between 0 and 10 years of auditory deprivation. Methods: Subjects were assessed before implantation and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-CI activation via Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition and Arizona Biomedical Institute (AzBio) sentence recognition in varying spatial speech and noise presentations that simulate head shadow, squelch, and summation effects (S0N0, SSSDNNH, SNHNSSD; 0 = front, SSD = impacted ear, NH = normal hearing ear). Patient-centered assessments were performed using Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ), and Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3). Device use data was acquired from manufacturer software. Further subgroup analysis was performed on data stratified by <5 years and 5-10 years duration of deafness. Results: In the SSD ear, median (IQR) CNC word scores pre-implant and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-implant were 0% (0-0%), 24% (8-44%), 28% (4-44%), and 18% (7-33%), respectively. At 6 months post-activation, AzBio scores in S0N0 and SSSDNNH configurations (n = 25) demonstrated statistically significant increases in performance by 5% (p = 0.03) and 20% (p = 0.005), respectively. The median HUI3 score was 0.56 pre-implant, lower than scores for common conditions such as anxiety (0.68) and diabetes (0.77), and comparable to stroke (0.58). Scores improved to 0.83 (0.71-0.91) by 3 months post-activation. These audiologic and subjective benefits were observed even in patients with longer durations of deafness. Discussion: By merging CI-associated changes in objective and patient-centered measures of auditory function, our findings implicate central mechanisms of auditory compensation and adaptation critical in auditory performance after SSD-CI and quantify the extent to which they affect the real-world experience reported by individuals.

Prosthetic Stimulation of the Vestibular Nerve Can Evoke Robust Eye and Head Movements Despite Prior Labyrinthectomy.

HYPOTHESIS: Prosthetic electrical stimulation can evoke compensatory eye and head movement despite vestibular implant electrode insertion occurring years after prior labyrinthectomy. BACKGROUND: Vestibular implants sense head rotation and directly stimulate the vestibular nerve, bypassing damaged end organs. Animal research and current clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. However, candidacy criteria for vestibular implants currently require presence of a patent labyrinth in the candidate ear and at least aidable hearing in the opposite ear, thus excluding patients who have undergone prior labyrinthectomy for unilateral Menière's disease that later progressed to bilateral vestibular hypofunction. METHODS: Eight years after right unilateral labyrinthectomy, we implanted stimulating electrodes in the previously exenterated right ear ampullae of a rhesus macaque monkey. The left labyrinth had long-standing hypofunction due to intratympanic gentamicin injection and surgical disruption. We used three-dimensional video-oculography to measure eye movement responses to prosthetic electrical stimulation. We also measured head-movement responses to prosthetic stimulation with the head unrestrained. RESULTS: Bilateral vestibular hypofunction was confirmed by absence of vestibuloocular reflex responses to whole-body rotation without prosthetic stimulation. For a subset of the implanted electrodes, prosthetic vestibular stimulation evoked robust compensatory eye and head movements. One electrode reliably elicited responses aligned with the implanted ear's anterior canal nerve regardless of the return electrode used. Similarly, a second electrode also elicited responses consistent with excitation of the horizontal canal nerve. Responses grew quasilinearly with stimulation rate and current amplitude. CONCLUSION: Prosthetic electrical stimulation targeting the vestibular nerve can be effective years after labyrinthectomy, if at least some parts of the vestibular nerve's ampullary branches remain despite destruction or removal of the membranous labyrinth.

The Next Challenges of Vestibular Implantation in Humans.

Patients with bilateral vestibulopathy suffer from a variety of complaints, leading to a high individual and social burden. Available treatments aim to alleviate the impact of this loss and improve compensatory strategies. Early experiments with electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve in combination with knowledge gained by cochlear implant research, have inspired the development of a vestibular neuroprosthesis that can provide the missing vestibular input. The feasibility of this concept was first demonstrated in animals and later in humans. Currently, several research groups around the world are investigating prototype vestibular implants, in the form of vestibular implants as well as combined cochlear and vestibular implants. The aim of this review is to convey the presentations and discussions from the identically named symposium that was held during the 2021 MidWinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, with researchers involved in the development of vestibular implants targeting the ampullary nerves. Substantial advancements in the development have been made. Yet, research and development processes face several challenges to improve this neuroprosthesis. These include, but are not limited to, optimization of the electrical stimulation profile, refining the surgical implantation procedure, preserving residual labyrinthine functions including hearing, as well as gaining regulatory approval and establishing a clinical care infrastructure similar to what exists for cochlear implants. It is believed by the authors that overcoming these challenges will accelerate the development and increase the impact of a clinically applicable vestibular implant.

Cochlear Implant Revisions Over Three Decades of Experience.

IMPORTANCE: The indications, technology, and surgical technique for cochlear implantation have evolved over the last three decades. Understanding the risk of cochlear implant revision (CIR) is important for patient counseling. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the rates, indications, and audiologic outcomes for CIR over three decades of experience at a single academic medical center. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed at a single academic medical center for individuals who underwent cochlear implantation between 1985 and 2022. SETTING: Single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand twenty-five individuals who underwent 3,934 cochlear implant operations from 1985 to 2022. EXPOSURE: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates, indications, risk factors, and audiologic outcomes for CIR. RESULTS: There were 276 cases of CIR after primary implantation and an overall revision rate of 7.6% (95% confidence interval, 6.8-8.5%) over 37 years of follow-up with many cases of CIR secondary to Advanced Bionics vendor B and field action failure groups. CIR rates increased sharply through the early and mid-2000s and have since remained stable. Hard or soft device failure was the most common indication for CIR, accounting for 73% of cases. Pediatric patient status and previous CIR were associated with an increased risk of CIR. Audiologic outcomes after CIR were similar to those before device failure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: CIR remains a common procedure most often performed for device failure. Pediatric patients and those who have undergone previous CIR are at the highest risk for future CIR. Audiologic outcomes remain stable after CIR, and these data will help providers counsel patients at the risk of future CIR and understand the risk factors associated with CIR.

Outcomes after revision of Advanced Bionics Clarion 1.2 cochlear implants.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implant reimplantation (CIR) for external processor upgrade or device failure is becoming increasingly common as the population of cochlear implant recipients ages. Patients with Advanced Bionics (AB) Clarion 1.2 cochlear implants may undergo CIR for device age/failure or desired technology upgrade so that they may use newer external processors that have improved connectivity features. The objective of this study was to evaluate audiologic outcomes for patients who were initially implanted with an AB Clarion 1.2 internal device and underwent CIR for technology upgrade or device failure. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed at a single academic medical center for patients (pediatric and adult) with an AB Clarion 1.2 internal device who underwent CIR to a later generation AB internal device and had available audiologic data. RESULTS: Forty-eight individuals with a Clarion 1.2 implant underwent CIR. Pre- and post-CIR speech understanding did not change for AzBio (p-value = 0.11, mean change = 12.1%, 95% CI = -2.9-27.2%), CNCw (p-value = 0.74, mean change = -1%, 95% CI = -10.4-12.4%), or HINT (p-value = 0.12, mean change = 19.9%, 95% CI = -2.6-42.4%) scores. Pure-tone averages improved following CIR (p-value < 0.01, mean change = 4.3 dB, 95% CI = 1.5-7.1 dB). CONCLUSIONS: Revision of AB Clarion 1.2 cochlear implants does not significantly worsen audiologic outcomes and may improve hearing in some individuals, but individual patient-level outcomes are variable.

Binocular 3-D otolith-ocular reflexes: responses of chinchillas to natural and prosthetic stimulation after ototoxic injury and vestibular implantation.

The otolith end organs inform the brain about gravitational and linear accelerations, driving the otolith-ocular reflex (OOR) to stabilize the eyes during translational motion (e.g., moving forward without rotating) and head tilt with respect to gravity. We previously characterized OOR responses of normal chinchillas to whole body tilt and translation and to prosthetic electrical stimulation targeting the utricle and saccule via electrodes implanted in otherwise normal ears. Here we extend that work to examine OOR responses to tilt and translation stimuli after unilateral intratympanic gentamicin injection and to natural/mechanical and prosthetic/electrical stimulation delivered separately or in combination to animals with bilateral vestibular hypofunction after right ear intratympanic gentamicin injection followed by surgical disruption of the left labyrinth at the time of electrode implantation. Unilateral intratympanic gentamicin injection decreased natural OOR response magnitude to about half of normal, without markedly changing OOR response direction or symmetry. Subsequent surgical disruption of the contralateral labyrinth at the time of electrode implantation surgery further decreased OOR magnitude during natural stimulation, consistent with bimodal-bilateral otolith end organ hypofunction (ototoxic on the right ear, surgical on the left ear). Delivery of pulse frequency- or pulse amplitude-modulated prosthetic/electrical stimulation targeting the left utricle and saccule in phase with whole body tilt and translation motion stimuli yielded responses closer to normal than the deficient OOR responses of those same animals in response to head tilt and translation alone.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous studies to expand the scope of prosthetic stimulation of the otolith end organs showed that selective stimulation of the utricle and saccule is possible. This article further defines those possibilities by characterizing a diseased animal model and subsequently studying its responses to electrical stimulation alone and in combination with mechanical motion. We show that we can partially restore responses to tilt and translation in animals with unilateral gentamicin ototoxic injury and contralateral surgical disruption.

Vestibular Implantation Can Work Even After More Than 20 Years of Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prosthetic stimulation delivered via a vestibular implant can elicit artificial sensation of head movement despite long (23-yr) duration adult-onset ototoxic bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH). STUDY DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Tertiary care center as part of a first-in-human clinical trial. PATIENTS: One. INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral vestibular implantation with an investigational multichannel vestibular implant in a 55-year-old man with a well-documented 23-year history of aminoglycoside-induced BVH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflexes (eeVOR). RESULTS: Vestibular implant stimulation can drive stimulus-aligned eeVOR and elicit a vestibular percept 23 years after the onset of bilateral vestibulopathy. Prosthetic stimulation targeting individual semicircular canals elicited eye movements that approximately aligned with each targeted canal's axis. The magnitude of the eeVOR response increased with increasing stimulus current amplitude. Response alignment and magnitude were similar to those observed for implant recipients who underwent vestibular implantation less than 10 years after BVH onset. Responses were approximately stable for 18 months of continuous device use (24 h/d except during sleep). CONCLUSIONS: Vestibular implantation and prosthetic electrical stimulation of semicircular canal afferent nerves can drive canal-specific eye movement responses more than 20 years after the onset of ototoxic vestibular hypofunction.

A prosthesis utilizing natural vestibular encoding strategies improves sensorimotor performance in monkeys.

Sensory pathways provide complex and multifaceted information to the brain. Recent advances have created new opportunities for applying our understanding of the brain to sensory prothesis development. Yet complex sensor physiology, limited numbers of electrodes, and nonspecific stimulation have proven to be a challenge for many sensory systems. In contrast, the vestibular system is uniquely suited for prosthesis development. Its peripheral anatomy allows site-specific stimulation of 3 separate sensory organs that encode distinct directions of head motion. Accordingly, here, we investigated whether implementing natural encoding strategies improves vestibular prosthesis performance. The eye movements produced by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), which plays an essential role in maintaining visual stability, were measured to quantify performance. Overall, implementing the natural tuning dynamics of vestibular afferents produced more temporally accurate VOR eye movements. Exploration of the parameter space further revealed that more dynamic tunings were not beneficial due to saturation and unnatural phase advances. Trends were comparable for stimulation encoding virtual versus physical head rotations, with gains enhanced in the latter case. Finally, using computational methods, we found that the same simple model explained the eye movements evoked by sinusoidal and transient stimulation and that a stimulation efficacy substantially less than 100% could account for our results. Taken together, our results establish that prosthesis encodings that incorporate naturalistic afferent dynamics and account for activation efficacy are well suited for restoration of gaze stability. More generally, these results emphasize the benefits of leveraging the brain's endogenous coding strategies in prosthesis development to improve functional outcomes.

Are Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients Consistent Across Different Tests?

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implant (CI) candidacy and postoperative outcomes are assessed using sets of speech perception tests that vary from center to center, limiting comparisons across institutions and time periods. The objective of this study was to determine if scores on one speech perception test could be reliably predicted from scores on another test. STUDY DESIGN: Arizona Biomedical (AzBio) Sentence Test, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word (CNCw), and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores in quiet for the implanted ear were collected for individuals who received a CI between 1985 and 2019. Scores collected during the same testing session were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots to assess agreement between testing methods. Simple linear regression with logit transformation was used to generate predictive functions and 95% confidence intervals for expected mean and individual scores. SETTING: Single academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 1,437 individuals with a median age of 59.9 years (range, 18-95 yr) and 46% (654 of 1,437) male. INTERVENTIONS: N.A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement as a function of test score, mean, variance, and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 2,052 AzBio/CNCw, 525 AzBio/HINT, and 7,187 CNCw/HINT same-session score pairings were identified. Pairwise test comparisons demonstrated limited agreement between different tests performed in the same session, and a score correlation between different speech tests revealed large variances. CONCLUSION: Transformation functions between test batteries were predictive of mean scores but performed poorly for prediction of individual scores. Point-wise comparisons of scores across CI test batteries should be used with caution in clinical and research settings.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing and Vestibular Loss in a Case of Relapsing Polychondritis.

OBJECTIVES: To report a case of profound bilateral sensorineural hearing and vestibular loss from relapsing polychondritis and hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: A 43 year-old woman developed sudden loss of hearing and balance that progressed over several weeks to bilateral, profound hearing and vestibular loss. Steroid treatments were ineffective. She underwent vestibular physical therapy and left cochlear implantation. About 10 months after her initial presentation, she developed erythema, warmth, swelling, and pain of the left auricle sparing the lobule, flattening of the bridge of her nose, and right ankle swelling, warmth, and skin erythema. A biopsy of the left auricle revealed histopathologic findings consistent with relapsing polychondritis. She was treated with high dose prednisolone. The ear inflammation resolved, however, despite excellent auditory response to pure tone thresholds, the patient reported no improvement in speech perception after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Relapsing polychondritis can present with rapidly progressive, profound loss of hearing and vestibular function. Hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation can include poor speech discrimination despite good pure tone detection thresholds.

Low-Noise Magnetic Coil System for Recording 3-Dimensional Eye Movements.

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular and oculomotor research often requires measurement of 3-dimensional (3D) eye orientation and movement with high spatial and temporal precision and accuracy. We describe the design, implementation, validation and use of a new magnetic coil system optimized for recording 3D eye movements using small scleral coils in animals. METHODS: Like older systems, the system design uses off-the-shelf components to drive three mutually orthogonal alternating magnetic fields at different frequencies. The scleral coil voltage induced by those fields is decomposed into 3 signals, each related to the coil's orientation relative to the axis of one field component. Unlike older systems based on analog demodulation and filtering, this system uses a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) to oversample each induced scleral coil voltage (at 25 Msamples/s), demodulate in the digital domain, and average over 25 ksamples per data point to generate 1 ksamples/s output in real time. RESULTS: Noise floor is <0.036° peak-to-peak and linearity error is < 0.1° during 345° rotations in all three dimensions. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: This FPGA-based design, which is both reprogrammable and freely available upon request, delivers sufficient performance to record eye movements at high spatial and temporal precision and accuracy using coils small enough for use with small animals.

An Implanted Vestibular Prosthesis Improves Spatial Orientation in Animals with Severe Vestibular Damage.

Gravity is a pervasive environmental stimulus, and accurate graviception is required for optimal spatial orientation and postural stability. The primary graviceptors are the vestibular organs, which include angular velocity (semicircular canals) and linear acceleration (otolith organs) sensors. Graviception is degraded in patients with vestibular damage, resulting in spatial misperception and imbalance. Since minimal therapy is available for these patients, substantial effort has focused on developing a vestibular prosthesis or vestibular implant (VI) that reproduces information normally provided by the canals (since reproducing otolith function is very challenging technically). Prior studies demonstrated that angular eye velocity responses could be driven by canal VI-mediated angular head velocity information, but it remains unknown whether a canal VI could improve spatial perception and posture since these behaviors require accurate estimates of angular head position in space relative to gravity. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a canal VI that transduces angular head velocity and provides this information to the brain via motion-modulated electrical stimulation of canal afferent nerves could improve the perception of angular head position relative to gravity in monkeys with severe vestibular damage. Using a subjective visual vertical task, we found that normal female monkeys accurately sensed the orientation of the head relative to gravity during dynamic tilts, that this ability was degraded following bilateral vestibular damage, and improved when the canal VI was used. These results demonstrate that a canal VI can improve graviception in vestibulopathic animals, suggesting that it could reduce the disabling perceptual and postural deficits experienced by patients with severe vestibular damage.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Patients with vestibular damage experience impaired vision, spatial perception, and balance, symptoms that could potentially respond to a vestibular implant (VI). Anatomic features facilitate semicircular canal (angular velocity) prosthetics but inhibit approaches with the otolith (linear acceleration) organs, and canal VIs that sense angular head velocity can generate compensatory eye velocity responses in vestibulopathic subjects. Can the brain use canal VI head velocity information to improve estimates of head orientation (e.g., head position relative to gravity), which is a prerequisite for accurate spatial perception and posture? Here we show that a canal VI can improve the perception of head orientation in vestibulopathic monkeys, results that are highly significant because they suggest that VIs mimicking canal function can improve spatial orientation and balance in vestibulopathic patients.

Posture, Gait, Quality of Life, and Hearing with a Vestibular Implant.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral vestibular hypofunction is associated with chronic disequilibrium, postural instability, and unsteady gait owing to failure of vestibular reflexes that stabilize the eyes, head, and body. A vestibular implant may be effective in alleviating symptoms. METHODS: Persons who had had ototoxic (7 participants) or idiopathic (1 participant) bilateral vestibular hypofunction for 2 to 23 years underwent unilateral implantation of a prosthesis that electrically stimulates the three semicircular canal branches of the vestibular nerve. Clinical outcomes included the score on the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency balance subtest (range, 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better balance), time to failure on the modified Romberg test (range, 0 to 30 seconds), score on the Dynamic Gait Index (range, 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating better gait performance), time needed to complete the Timed Up and Go test, gait speed, pure-tone auditory detection thresholds, speech discrimination scores, and quality of life. We compared participants' results at baseline (before implantation) with those at 6 months (8 participants) and at 1 year (6 participants) with the device set in its usual treatment mode (varying stimulus pulse rate and amplitude to represent rotational head motion) and in a placebo mode (holding pulse rate and amplitude constant). RESULTS: The median scores at baseline and at 6 months on the Bruininks-Oseretsky test were 17.5 and 21.0, respectively (median within-participant difference, 5.5 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 10.0); the median times on the modified Romberg test were 3.6 seconds and 8.3 seconds (difference, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 27.6); the median scores on the Dynamic Gait Index were 12.5 and 22.5 (difference, 10.5 points; 95% CI, 1.5 to 12.0); the median times on the Timed Up and Go test were 11.0 seconds and 8.7 seconds (difference, 2.3; 95% CI, -1.7 to 5.0); and the median speeds on the gait-speed test were 1.03 m per second and 1.10 m per second (difference, 0.13; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.30). Placebo-mode testing confirmed that improvements were due to treatment-mode stimulation. Among the 6 participants who were also assessed at 1 year, the median within-participant changes from baseline to 1 year were generally consistent with results at 6 months. Implantation caused ipsilateral hearing loss, with the air-conducted pure-tone average detection threshold at 6 months increasing by 3 to 16 dB in 5 participants and by 74 to 104 dB in 3 participants. Changes in participant-reported disability and quality of life paralleled changes in posture and gait. CONCLUSIONS: Six months and 1 year after unilateral implantation of a vestibular prosthesis for bilateral vestibular hypofunction, measures of posture, gait, and quality of life were generally in the direction of improvement from baseline, but hearing was reduced in the ear with the implant in all but 1 participant. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02725463.).

The vestibular implant: Opinion statement on implantation criteria for research.

This opinion statement proposes a set of candidacy criteria for vestibular implantation of adult patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) in a research setting. The criteria include disabling chronic symptoms like postural imbalance, unsteadiness of gait and/or head movement-induced oscillopsia, combined with objective signs of reduced or absent vestibular function in both ears. These signs include abnormal test results recorded during head impulses (video head impulse test or scleral coil technique), bithermal caloric testing and rotatory chair testing (sinusoidal stimulation of 0.1 Hz). Vestibular implant (VI) implantation criteria are not the same as diagnostic criteria for bilateral vestibulopathy. The major difference between VI-implantation criteria and the approved diagnostic criteria for BVP are that all included vestibular tests of semicircular canal function (head impulse test, caloric test, and rotatory chair test) need to show significant impairments of vestibular function in the implantation criteria. For this, a two-step paradigm was developed. First, at least one of the vestibular tests needs to fulfill stringent criteria, close to those for BVP. If this is applicable, then the other vestibular tests have to fulfill a second set of criteria which are less stringent than the original criteria for BVP. If the VI-implantation is intended to excite the utricle and/or saccule (otolith stimulation), responses to cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials must be absent in addition to the above mentioned abnormalities of semicircular canal function. Finally, requirements for safe and potentially effective stimulation should be met, including implanting patients with BVP of peripheral origin only, and assessing possible medical and psychiatric contraindications.

Retinoic acid degradation shapes zonal development of vestibular organs and sensitivity to transient linear accelerations.

Each vestibular sensory epithelium in the inner ear is divided morphologically and physiologically into two zones, called the striola and extrastriola in otolith organ maculae, and the central and peripheral zones in semicircular canal cristae. We found that formation of striolar/central zones during embryogenesis requires Cytochrome P450 26b1 (Cyp26b1)-mediated degradation of retinoic acid (RA). In Cyp26b1 conditional knockout mice, formation of striolar/central zones is compromised, such that they resemble extrastriolar/peripheral zones in multiple features. Mutants have deficient vestibular evoked potential (VsEP) responses to jerk stimuli, head tremor and deficits in balance beam tests that are consistent with abnormal vestibular input, but normal vestibulo-ocular reflexes and apparently normal motor performance during swimming. Thus, degradation of RA during embryogenesis is required for formation of highly specialized regions of the vestibular sensory epithelia with specific functions in detecting head motions.